Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothy Galton

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 05:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Dorothy Galton[edit]

(

)

... that bee-keeper Dorothy Galton was suspected by MI5 of being a Russian spy?

Reviewed: Chappel Viaduct
Comment: Still under construction but I should be able to finish it in the next few days.

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 12:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC).

Review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - The section "Death" is currently quite close in wording and content to the DNB. It could use some more copy editing to freshen up the prose.

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image eligibility:

Freely licensed: - na
Used in article: - na
Clear at 100px: - na

QPQ: - to be done
Invalid status "more work re...copy-editing" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

Thanks, I have a huge amount on her. I shall finish it soon. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

It has been nearly a month (to be precise: January 26) that this article was improved by someone who was not a bot. This nomination really needs some work done in the next couple of days, or it will unfortunately run out of time.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 16:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

You are right. I will do it within the next day. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Just done quite a lot. Will do more tomorrow. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Article is ready now. I will do the QPQ in the next day. Philafrenzy (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

QPQ done. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

With the QPQ done and the section about the death somewhat rephrased, I'll assume in good faith that the close paraphrasing with the DNB source (which I cannot access) has now been resolved. This is therefore ready to move on!—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 22:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)