Template:Did you know nominations/Dinosaur erotica
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dinosaur erotica[edit]
- ... that titles in the dinosaur erotica genre include works such as Taken by the T-Rex (mating T-Rexes pictured), Ravished by Triceratops and A Billionaire Dinosaur Forced Me Gay?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pseudomugil mellis
- Comment: Strange but true...
Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 13:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC).
- My reaction seeing this come up on my watchlist? "Oh f***". I am sadly aware that, yes, this has become a genre. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- See rule 34. Guy (Help!) 22:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- You sure have a gift for bringing the weird to Wikipedia, Prioryman... ;-) Anyway, article new enough, long enough, and well referenced; hook short enough, interesting enough (how could it not be?) but... I couldn't see where the titles Taken by the T-Rex and In the Velociraptor's Nest were cited (the ref for Billionaire Dinosaur doesn't seem to mention them). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Ian Rose: Er, thanks, I'll take that as a compliment - I think! The first two are in the very first ref in the article - see [1], para 1. I've replaced In the Velociraptor's Nest with the much juicier Ravished by Triceratops and added another ref to cover Billionaire Dinosaur in the lede. Prioryman (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Tks, good to go. As to the compliment (which it was), well no-one could forget Icelandic Phallological Museum... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Ian Rose: Er, thanks, I'll take that as a compliment - I think! The first two are in the very first ref in the article - see [1], para 1. I've replaced In the Velociraptor's Nest with the much juicier Ravished by Triceratops and added another ref to cover Billionaire Dinosaur in the lede. Prioryman (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- You sure have a gift for bringing the weird to Wikipedia, Prioryman... ;-) Anyway, article new enough, long enough, and well referenced; hook short enough, interesting enough (how could it not be?) but... I couldn't see where the titles Taken by the T-Rex and In the Velociraptor's Nest were cited (the ref for Billionaire Dinosaur doesn't seem to mention them). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
