Template:Did you know nominations/Compulsory Process Clause

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Compulsory Process Clause[edit]

(

)

... that the Compulsory Process Clause of the United States Constitution allows defendants to force the attendance of witnesses in their favor?

Reviewed: Presbyterian Church of Victoria
Comment: This is 5x expansion. I think it meets it, looking at page history. If it needs more, please ping me so I can the extra bit it needs.

Created/expanded by Lord Roem (talk). Self nom at 20:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Not a review: Yes, you expanded it from 571b of prose to 3604b in about 3 days. That is about 6.3x. Chris857 (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
I agree that this article is sufficiently expanded. It is also new enough and within policy. The hook is appropriately referenced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)