Talk:Ze'ev Herzog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ze'ev Herzog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David's palace[edit]

Happily, Yosef Garfinkel found David's palace again, 25 km further away. That's what I wrote. Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe[edit]

Minimalists won the game, maximalists lost. Minimalists got to define the mainstream, maximalists are WP:FRINGE. Minimalists failed to remove the Bible from archaeology, for the rest they scored total victory. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think winning is the right approach, but yes, we shouldn't attempt to balance mainstream views with opinions (WP:GEVAL is relevant). Adding: I saw in the edit summary a claim like that all are only opinions and equally valid. That's not really the case as understanding increases with advancements and discoveries, informed by science. —PaleoNeonate – 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, what was WP:RS in 1999, no longer is so in 2021. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adding for completeness: I don't think there's a problem with using a source to mention that an academic is minimalist or maximalist in a certain area of course, but the way this was made to "balance" or claim that Herzog's view is fringe was incorrect and violated WP:GEVAL. —PaleoNeonate – 11:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]