Talk:Young Dracula

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

My Parents are Aliens[edit]

Right. Some anonomous IP keeps repeatedly adding in their own opinion about how this show relates to My Parents are Aliens. Now, in my opinion, the two are very, very different. As this is my opinion, it shows that it is equally opinion to assume that they are similar. Please, either stop re-adding this personal analysis, or find a 100% rock-solid reliable third-party source to confirm that it is indeed designed to be similar to MPAA. _TheIslander 13:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Well, they are at least similar in terms of the parents not being in tune with modern human life... Not050 (talk) 07:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yep, I won't disagree there. However, that's one small comparison. In my opinion, substantial comparisons would have to be made before it'd be a notable enough fact to include in the article. _TheIslander 09:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose my main concern with the "Incorporated themes" section is that it appears to end rather suddenly. It mentions the things that are central to the series, but does not say how or why this is appealing to young audiences. Perhaps if it were compared to another children's series that a reader might be familiar with, it might clarify a few of those things. I don't know. That's just my two pennies' worth on the issue. Not050 (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Not050[reply]

...and a very decent two pennies they were too :). I'd certainly agree with you, that section does end rather abbruptly. However, I don't think comparing it to another programme is a good idea - if people are aware of MPAA, chances are they'll be aware of Young Dracula too. I dunno, it just seems like a) a completely pointless comparisson to me, but more importantly b) rather POV-esque, in that while person A might think the two programmes very similar, person B might not. Still, your point is 100% valid, it does end suddenly. We just need to come up with a different way to solve that problem. _TheIslander 19:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

I am wondering whether we need to have Ivan, Boris and Olga here, since they only appeared in two or three episodes. If nobody has any objections, I think I'm going to incoporate references to them in descriptions of the other, more important characters to the series in the same way that "Will" is referred to under Ingrid's section (unless of course anyone thinks he also deserves his own section), or perhaps, as was done for Grandma Dracula, Crone, in an earlier edition of the article, we could resurrect the category of "rare casts" and describe them under there. Not050 (talk) 01:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I personally would be in favour of keeping them. Yes, they only appeared in three episodes, but they have been referenced in quite a few more. Also, unlike, say, Crone, who has little influence on the overall story outside 'her' episode, I feel that these characters do. To be honest, I'd also be in favour of creating a section for Will, if not now then once we have more information on him. _Talk Islander 01:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not overly keen on the idea, but I will agree to wait until the end of the series before I think about making any alterations again. Not050 (talk) 07:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hold the horses...[edit]

There's a padlock on this now? Has there been vandalism on the article in my absence? Not050 (talk) 22:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Not050[reply]

There's been a slew of anon. IPs trying to add speculation to the article, so another non-involved admin semi-protected the article. Won't affect you, as you're an established user. _Talk Islander 23:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, good. Thanks for clearing that up for me. And actually, I'm uncomfortable with there being so many alterations and elaborate details on each character unless it is to correct spelling or grammar, so I'm kind of glad the restriction is there. Not050 (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Not050[reply]

Agreed, some user's have been going completely over the top with the detail that they've been including. I'd say that the version of the article roughly before the episode where Ingrid bites Will was good - all details added after that are unneccesary. _Talk Islander 23:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final verdict (for now)[edit]

Very well then, people. I've cleared up some of the details on the central characters that were unresolved prior to the final episode, and have tried to tidy up the "Incorporated Themes" section to make it less cryptic. All I need now is to see how everyone else feels about the Ivan-Boris-Olga section, due to the length of the page and then (I hope) I will not be tearing my hair out over the article as a whole quite as often. Not050 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV Check nomination[edit]

One bit that caught my eye as I was reverting vandalism: Young_Dracula#Renfield: "Renfield is a disgusting specimen who likes nothing more than eating maggots and nothing less than "breathers"" There are other examples throughout the character descriptions. RoadieRich (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a neutrality issue, but it does need rewriting in an encyclopedic fashion. 62.56.110.94 (talk) 02:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not simply re-write it?! Personally, having watched this on YouTube that is a pretty apt description of Renfield!! Noble Korhedron 00:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Korhedron (talk • contribs)

Character clean-up[edit]

I have greatly condensed the characters section to give a more general overview, cutting out some of the in-depth detail, and removed the sub-headings for each, which makes the table of contents more manageable. I hope that makes it a little bit more encyclopedic than it was. 62.56.93.185 (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young drac.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Young drac.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]