Talk:Woonerf

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands Start‑class

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality Issue:'Woonerf Revisited'[edit]

Perhaps the author could cite his or her source for this, it sounds very weasely. Maybe we could have an altenative title.

The source for the paragraph is cited at the end of the paragraph - note number 4. -- de Facto (talk). 23:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of "woonerf"[edit]

woonerf is a Dutch compound noun comprising woon (from the verb wonen, reside, live) + erf (area, sector). The English translation offered in this article is "recreation area"; exactly the opposite of the correct translation: residential area. miltonBradley 13:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpoticha (talk • contribs)

Organisation of similar articles?[edit]

We currently have a number of articles describing pretty much the same concept, including Woonerf, Living street, home zone and complete streets. Can I suggest that we use 'Living street' as the top level article for the concept which describes it in its most general, and use the other articles to describe their implementation in different jurisdictions. For example, home zone would describe in detail approach taken in the UK and the historical process, Woonerf would focus on the Dutch/Flanders experience and Complete streets that of the USA (or should that one cover the North American experience including Canada)? An alternative approach, which doesn't seem as good to me, might be to combine the various articles into one. Any comments? PeterEastern (talk) 12:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviving this discussion, I just noticed the same problem. Worse, the nl.wiki article article on woonerf is linked to Living street, not this article. Also from my research so far it seems that the term "woonerf" is gaining popularity in U.S. popular media. — Brianhe (talk) 01:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Woonerf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130910041228/http://vta.org/inside/boards/committee_advisory/bpac/agendas_minutes/2012/01_jan/bpac_011112_workshop.pdf to http://www.vta.org/inside/boards/committee_advisory/bpac/agendas_minutes/2012/01_jan/bpac_011112_workshop.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]