This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
One editor briefly questioned the notability of this article. In response, I have added five additional sources, including newspaper articles from widely known papers such as The Hill (newspaper). I would also like to point out that this article is about a piece of U.S. federal legislation that has passed the House of Representatives - only a very small percentage of introduced bills do that. I personally believe that should grant the article the benefit of a doubt. If you disagree, I'd be happy to discuss it with you and others. Thanks. HistoricMN44 (talk) 15:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
