Talk:Women reading in art

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Article subject and style[edit]

I disagree that this entry is written as an opinion piece. In fact, the author is creating a whole new subject for Wikipedia that is a valid, historical subject in the history of art. She is giving concrete examples of the topos of women in art and describing the content. Nmcourtright (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a few changes and additions that move this towards a more encyclopedic tone, mainly in the first paragraph. I think the 'opinion' problem is a result of trying to convey the opinion of Conlon who is cited several times and perhaps too much weight is put on his opinion with no counter arguments. My feeling is that those sections should be heavily edited and made clearer that it is his opinion only. Derek Andrews (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kwesthoven.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]