Talk:Witch (archetype)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 August 2023 by reviewer S0091 (talk · contribs).

Mythology

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Possible resources[edit]

The quotes in this section are just to give you an idea of what's in the sources, or what might be written on the topics.

Further reading?

Avens, Roberts (1977). "The Image of the Devil in C. G. Jung's Psychology". Journal of Religion and Health. 16 (3): 196–222. doi:10.1007/BF01533320. JSTOR 27505406. PMID 24318090. S2CID 13610615. Retrieved 2023-07-24.</ref>

Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 14:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Hi @Skyerise thank you for making efforts to address my concern about this potentially being a contentious article. I see you have pinged CorbieVreccan and left them a note on their talk page and I have pinged Robert so moving the discussion here. Pinging @Esowteric as well. Again, I recognize my concern may not be valid but I guess better safe than sorry. S0091 (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. That's the same reason I submitted as a draft rather than just moving the article. I'd rather see objections first so they can be addressed, if needed. Skyerise (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyerise I am going to give this another day for responses, which seems unlikely at this point. Otherwise, I will accept the draft. S0091 (talk) 14:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Sound good to me. Skyerise (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]