Talk:Wissam al-Tawil

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:

You must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wissam al-Tawil article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Wissam al-Tawil was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 January 2024.

Wikipedia

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Lebanon Low‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Middle East / Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Wrong Details[edit]

Wissam al-Tawil is confirmed NOT to be the brother-in-law of Nasrallah, as reported by Hezbullah-affiliated channels and accounts

There's also no confirmation of Wissam Al-Tawil being in the Rudwan Unit, since the pictures of him released showcased 2 patches: 1 officer corps patch, and 1 infantry brigade patch InfiniteValrath (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Word Choice[edit]

Assassinated should be changed to killed. Assassinated puts a non-neutral spin on the story. 76.230.211.64 (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems reasonable, so I have changed it. The English-language sources do not use the word "assassinate" or "assassination". I have not assessed the non-English ones, so someone else can chime in on those. ArcticSeeress (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]