Talk:Wheaton World Wide Moving

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Advertisement[edit]

Just stumbled on this article while looking for a moving company. It reads like a promo and has only 1 source (a link to some award they received, no less).

This is a rather large company with tons of franchise affiliates and reviews. BBB rates them A+ so I'm sure they're a good company and all that, but this is Wikipedia, not Craigslist. This article is a promotional stub. Given the company's size, I don't believe the article should be removed, but it definitely needs to be re-written. 174.31.211.152 (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the Wheaton page and made it less like an advertisement. I'll continue to work on updating it, but could you remove this comment? Mslavens (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took out some more unencyclopediac content. Is the bullet-list of "history" really encyclopediac either? Seems like it's a mish-mash of awards and "firsts" (all uncited!), relationships (mergers, renames) to other companies (should be written as unified prose?), and sponsorships/philanthropy (should be written as unified prose?). I think User:Mslavens's hit'n'run contributions and response to the above concern suggests a professional relationship with this company. DMacks (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]