Talk:Weathering with You

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://jpbound.com/2019/07/21/tenki-no-ko-weathering-with-you-full-story-synopsis-spoilers/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Masum Reza📞 18:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic peer review[edit]

Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program on 20:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC), and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[1]
     Expanding... Masum Reza📞 00:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[2]
  • The script has spotted the following contractions: Doesn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
     Comment: Only "doesn't" I see in the article, is in the citation 44 title. Since it is the original title, I don't think we should change it. Masum Reza📞 20:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][3]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[4]
     Comment: I asked for copyediting on GOCE. Masum Reza📞 23:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.

References

  1. ^ User:AndyZ/G#lead
  2. ^ User:AndyZ/G#underlink
  3. ^ User:AndyZ/G#footspace
  4. ^ User:AndyZ/G#copyedit

Pre-GA review[edit]

Hi Masumrezarock100. Completely outside anything I have ever experienced in RL or edited on Wikipedia. (I mostly edit history articles). That said, I picked up a couple of things:
  • The "Reception" section seems thin for a supposedly notable film. Maybe have a look at this section in some films that have passed GAN - Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama?
  • Some statements don't make sense, I assume because of lack of context. Eg "SoftBank and Weathering with You were seen to promote each other in various TV clips." I have no idea what this means. (See two points down.)
  • A number of additional Wikilinks could usefully be used. (Eg Encore Films.)
  • Try to read it as if it was written for someone who knows nothing about the topic, after all Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Then add in, succinctly, the information needed to understand.
  • Having glanced at some other film articles, there seems to be less information than one would expect at GAN in every section other than "Plot". Eg, the two main characters each have only two short sentences of description. Compare with [[1]]. (Just a random example I found.)
  • The titles of all films should be in italics - as in the tile of the article: Weathering with You.

All of that said, there is little to fault with what is there. It is good, clear, well written and solidly referenced. (Except for "The other songs include "Voice of Wind" (風たちの声 "Kaze-tachi no Koe"), "Celebration" (祝祭 "Shukusai") and "We'll Be Alright (大丈夫 "Daijōbu").) So I suspect that it could be worked up into a GAN, but I don't think that it is there yet.

As I said, this is completely outside my area, so treat everything I say with care. Let me know if you do want to work Weathering with You towards GAN and I will keep an eye on it and perhaps offer occasional advice. Copied from Gog the Mild's talk page on 22:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC) by Masum Reza📞 , originally added on 18:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help?[edit]

Hi Baffle gab1978, thanks for all your help. I've a question if you don't mind me asking. Where in the article, I should include this following information? it was selected as the Japanese entry for the Best International Feature Film at the 92nd Academy Awards. It is currently in the lead, but the lead summarizes the content of the article, so I should mention it in the article. Any suggestions would be helpful. Again, thanks. Masum Reza📞 04:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add in Box Office figures from Southeast Asia[edit]

Can anyone update the total worldwide Box Office with the following figures from Southeast Asia countries?

  • Singapore - $750,000 (S$1.04 million) + highest-grossing anime film in Singapore

Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/weathering-with-you-is-top-anime-film-in-singapore

  • Malaysia, Brunei - $670,000 (RM 2,838,344) + All-Time No.1 Animation Film in Malaysia and Brunei

Source: https://anitrendz.net/news/2019/10/06/weathering-with-you-crosses-the-s1-million-mark-in-singapore/

  • Indonesia - $738,000 (Rp 10,468,653,500)

Source: https://anitrendz.net/news/2019/10/06/weathering-with-you-crosses-the-s1-million-mark-in-singapore/

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Weathering with You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 18:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures[edit]

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links[edit]

  • Could you had some more details to these sources:

[2], [3], [4]

  • Replaced [5] with a better source. The YouTube source and the other twitter source is reliable since they are coming from the official licensors. Thanks. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you be a little more consistent in either linking or not linking publishers (I usually just remove wholesale.)
  • ref 87 has Morrissy, Kim (July 24, 2019). "REVIEW: Weathering With You". Anime News Network. Anime News Network. Archived from the original on July 24, 2019. Retrieved July 24, 2019. - Two entries for Anime News Network.
     Fixed. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

  • On rating aggregator websites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, the film generally been rated positively by critics. - OTT, we already said this in the sentence prior. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Changed to On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 91% rating, with the critics' consensus saying; it is beautifully animated and narratively engaged. On Metacritic, the film scored 72 out of 100 showing generally favorable reaction. Do you think it's okay? Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Except we don't generally put the actual review scores in prose. On Metacritic, just use the actual words it uses. Otherwise fine. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • criticised the film for being a follow up to Your Name, adding that it depends too much on it - needs a bit better wording. Being a follow up isn't what they are criticising. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, used another hook for criticism. Please check. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

  • I have no idea if the plot section is accurate. But maybe a couple more wikilinks? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I copyedited the plot section and expanded it a bit and added more wikilinks too. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production seems a little flat. Only that it was announced, what the team was. Is there no info on the creation/animation dates or anything? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    plus Added. Please check the second para of the Production section. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other key roles were filled with returning crew members of Your Name. - might need to explain why this show is important. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm, I don't think we should "explain" it in details in this article. But I have added a few things about Your Name in the article. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think you need subsections for adaptations.
    minus Removed. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've done some copyedits. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lee Vilenski: I think I got the most of it. I have also expanded other sections, including characters and adaptions section. Let me know if you have more comments. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments[edit]

  • I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA and FA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
I'm going to go ahead an pass this - I've added some additional fixes for the links to do at your leisure. If you wish to take this any further, I'd recommend less reliance on sources such twitter, youtube and forbes. However, good work on the article, and well done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to thank you those who contributed to this article, and Japanese wiki editors who helped me indirectly by finding sources, and expanding the article on Japanese Wikipedia. They are the reason I was able to get this article promoted to GA. This article still needs few improvements; I will take a look at them later when I have time. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • ... that more than 2,000 people auditioned for the roles of the anime film Weathering with You's two protagonists Hodaka and Hina? Source: Meanwhile, he praised the film's two main voice cast members, 18-year-old Kotaro Daigo (Hodaka Morishima) and 17-year-old Nana Mori (Hina Amano). "They have wonderful voices to listen to, which can make you think that they are the boy and the girl you want to support. Since the audition with 2,000 participants, they have delivered their hand raising-like voices, like 'Look at me!' They showed great performances that convinced us that these two were here for this film." [6]
    • ALT0a ... that around 2,000 people auditioned for the roles of the anime film Weathering with You's two protagonists?
    • ALT1:... that the anime film Weathering with You was inspired by climate change affecting Japan? Source: Shinkai also was inspired by the impact of climate change on Japan. [7]
    • ALT2:... that Makoto Shinkai chose a more supernatural approach on the anime film Weathering with You as opposed to the science-fiction angle he used for his previous film Your Name? Source: While “Your Name” had a science-fiction angle, Shinkai went for a more supernatural approach on “Weathering With You.” [8]

Improved to Good Article status by Ainz Ooal Gown (talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • I've made some formatting changes to the hooks; this is the nominator's first DYK so a QPQ will not be needed. It might be a good idea for whatever hook is approved to go up on August 22, the birthday of the film's main female character Hina. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I could do some of the basic checks but as I had helped suggest ALT1 and ALT2 off-wiki a different editor will need to give the final approval. For transparency I would indicate my preference for the original hook. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article was promoted to GA status on time, no close paraphrasing was found, no QPQ is needed. Owing to the fact that I had been involved in helping with formulating the hooks over on Discord I will leave the review of the hooks to another editor. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source for ALT0 indicates a round 2000, not the "more than" used in the hook and article. I would also recommend dropping the character names as not adding to the rest of the hook. ALT1 and ALT2 work, but ALT2 seems unlikely to appeal to a broad audience. Not passing for now in case ALT0 remains preferred and can be edited. Deferring to Narutolovehinata5 on the rest of the requirements. CMD (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis: Would ALT0a ... that around 2,000 people auditioned for the roles of the anime film Weathering with You's two protagonists? work better? As for the other requirements, ALT0/ALT0a is cited inline and verified in the source, ALT1's source does not appear in the relevant sentence itself but rather the end of the paragraph that contains it, and ALT2 is also cited inline and verified. As mentioned above, once this is passed, it is kindly requested that this be moved to the special occasions area under August 22 for the earlier mentioned reasons. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that would be fine. If Ainz Ooal Gown is happy with it, I will pass this for 22 August. CMD (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis: yeah, it's cool. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 12:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
unstruck ALTs. CMD (talk) 13:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis: then please pass this by appending yes value to the passed parameter. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I came by to promote ALT0a to Prep 5 for a daytime appearance in Tokyo on August 22. I understand why the Plot section need not be sourced, but why are all these character descriptions allowed to be unsourced? Per WP:DYK#Cited hook, each hook fact needs an inline citation. There is none for the August 22 birthday. Yoninah (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The plot section is still unsourced.--evrik (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm very sorry, but whether a source for it can be found or not, a fictional character's birth date is not a valid special occasion, something we have established in the past here at DYK—such hooks have been refused a special date. If you wish to appeal this, the place to go is WT:DYK, but I hope further thought about the idea of what is truly special will result in the request being dropped. Pinging Narutolovehinata5, who has been pushing for the date, and also nominator Ainz Ooal Gown. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BlueMoonset and Yoninah: Some of my previous birthday-related requests (even character birthdays) have been allowed on DYK in the past so I'm not exactly sure why it's problematic this time around (in this case, it's the birthday of the film's lead female character and not just any random character). If the August 22 date won't be permitted, would running the hook on August 31 (the birthday of Nana Mori, the film's lead actress) be a suitable alternative? If not, I'd be okay with it running as a regular hook. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Narutolovehinata5, regular people birthdays are fine, but had I been aware of any character birthdays I would have objected then, and I'm disappointed that special occasions have become so debased that a fictional character's fictional birthday might be considered "special" and have been placed on the main page for that reason. The birthday of the lead actress seems like a stretch to me, especially as she isn't mentioned in any hook, but at least it's an actual human being. I'll leave it to Yoninah, who is more active on DYK special occasion promotions to prep, to judge whether August 31 should be considered, or if this nom should run as a regular hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personally, I also think these birthday requests are getting out of hand. I just commented as much on another editor's page. To me, "special occasions" means a significant anniversary, not a random birthday. Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. If Yoninah has agreed to run this as a regular hook then I will not object. As for the character descriptions part, I thought normally they're allowed to not have citations since they're usually assumed to be cited to the source material themselves? As Ainz hasn't been on-Wiki in weeks I'm willing to take over this nomination from him and address any remaining concerns. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I haven't looked, but you need to find the policy on running characterization text without sources. Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • MOS:PLOTSOURCE and WP:FILMPLOT seem to be the relevant guidelines here, but they only seem to refer to plot sections and not character sections. They do suggest that discussing plot details without references is generally allowed as long as the information is descriptive and not analytical (in which case the source material is treated as a primary source). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's what I thought. These detailed characterizations really need sourcing. I'm surprised that wasn't caught in the GA review. Yoninah (talk) 23:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Admittedly I have less experience when it comes to writing about characters but from what I understand about anime articles (I'm less familiar with the circumstances in other forms of media) "uncited" character sections are allowed and are generally the norm, even for GAs. Considering the subject is a film and not a series, wouldn't citing to the film itself suffice for character descriptions? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe. But I'm not an expert. Perhaps you could ask at WikiProject Film? Yoninah (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the article still has issues, the date request is moot. --evrik (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've made a request over at WT:FILM asking for help. Courtesy ping to the original GA reviewer Lee Vilenski. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- to be honest, I assumed character sections like this were also included in plot. The information on portrayal is sourced, so the rest is very plot related. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The nominator told me off-wiki that they are currently busy in real life and so may not be able to return to the article soon, but has given me permission to adopt the nomination in their stead. @Yoninah: Apart from the Character section are there any other issues preventing this from moving forward? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Narutolovehinata5: I've been involved in enough film articles lately to know that the Plot section does not need sources per WP:FILMPLOT, so I removed that tag. However, the excessive descriptions of the characters do need some kind of sourcing. Perhaps these paragraphs should just be deleted?
  • There is also some close paraphrasing from the Variety source:
  • Source: Shinkai also was inspired by the impact of climate change on Japan, which has seen an increasing number of water-related disasters, including more rainfall each summer.
  • Article: He also added that he was inspired by the recent impact of climate change on Japan, which has seen an increasing number of water-related hazards, including more rainfall each summer.
  • Yoninah (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: I've changed the phrasing that matched the Variety source, and it now reads as He also added that he was influenced by the impact of climate change on Japan, particularly the increase in rainfall during the summer months. Does that work? And apart from the character descriptions, is there anything else that needs to be revised? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that takes care of the close paraphrasing, thanks. And no, there's nothing else except sourcing the character descriptions. Yoninah (talk) 10:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I recently watched the film and for the most part the descriptions seem accurate, despite all the details. Would simply using the film itself as a reference not work? I'm not sure if there's any other way to source them otherwise without simply trimming those parts down. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Narutolovehinata5: Our criteria is Rule D2: at least one cite per paragraph. I have seen other film and video game articles where the characterizations do have some kind of sourcing. If you are unable to find a non-primary source, I think these characterizations should be deleted. Yoninah (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. I'll ask for help from Tintor2 as he has more experience when it comes to writing character articles and how to source them. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about this film but when I write film characters I only put real world info rather than inuiverse info. Tintor2 (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]
Is there any commentary from a particular voice actor? This type of real type of info tends to be more notable than fictional characters at the time of writing a DYK.Tintor2 (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintor2: I didn't find much specifically about Weathering with You (most of the interviews I could find about Mori were about her career in general or her other roles), but I did find this interview. It seems to be more about their experiences working on the film than thoughts on their characters, however. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: I've tried looking for sources for the character section but have come up empty. Should I simply remove the section and replace it with a cast list table, move it to a "List of Weathering with You characters" article, or cut out all but the first few sentences of each character's description? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For example, if I were to simplify the blurb on Hina Amano to something like She is a third year junior high school student who is taking part-time jobs to support her family after her mother's death. Due to her ability to clear a localized area of rain by praying, she starts a crowdfunding website with Kodaka where she does requests in exchange for money. and do the same for the rest of the characters, would that solve the issues? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I think you should delete everything that doesn't have cites. Yoninah (talk) 13:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: So basically replace the character list with a cast table? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Yes, retaining the voice actors with cites. Yoninah (talk) 14:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: I've replaced the character section with a Voice cast list (which also includes one-sentence blurbs about the characters). Does this now address the concerns? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • All set, thanks. Restoring tick for either ALT1 or ALT2 per CMD's review. Yoninah (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Box Office of Weathering With You[edit]

Hello pagestalkers. The following message was left on my talkpage by a new editor (probably because I left a "Welcome to Wikipedia!" message on that editor's talkpage so they had my contact info).

Recently, I went through the page of Weathering with You, I found that a line 'The film grossed over ¥35.11 billion (US$322.08 million) worldwide.' where no source are added to confirm the gross. Can you please help me in relocating the reference for the gross. But, I have a thought in my mind that $322.08 million is too high for the film. Serana Moegi (talk) 04:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC).

Serana Moegi, I am hopeful that someone who has watchlisted this article can answer your question. --Rosiestep (talk) 08:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Serana Moegi:, @Rosiestep: I just fixed the stated error. Box Office Mojo was the source provided for the gross but the article completely contradicted this source. Not sure how this happened but it’s fixed now. KaitoNkmra23 (talk!) 11:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KaitoNkmra23:;@Rosiestep: Thank you for your help and concern to my question! Have a good day. Serana Moegi (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

voice cast vs characters[edit]

I was just wondering if it'd be better to rename the section to "characters" like in Your Name Hodakatokyoboy (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Weathering_with_You&oldid=1207277794"