Talk:Wat Phra Kaew/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Paul 012 (talk · contribs) 07:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, but I'm going to have to 
quick fail this nomination. The prose is not particularly well written. The article contains numerous factual inaccuracies, and in-line citations to reliable sources are lacking. The coverage is unbalanced, giving too much detail on the Buddha statue (which has its own article) and too little on the architecture, history and importance of the temple itself. I don't see outstanding issues regarding neutrality and stability; media use needs to be adjusted to better comply with the MOS. This will require much more work before it's GA-ready. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I've noticed that User:Sodacan has mentioned that he is working on a major revision of the article. I'd be happy to do a full review for that version—please consider re-nominating then. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)