Talk:Warmonger: Operation Downtown Destruction

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Wally Scharold (3 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (start)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (nom)
Klefki (start)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (start)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (start)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Proposed deletion[edit]

I can see why this page might be criticised for the way it is written, but does the proposer (Gotonull) have any constructive criticism? I'm not involved with the game - I just thought it was strange that there was no page for the game, so I made an admittedly flawed page. If someone with more experience at writing at a wikipedia level of neutrality, preferably with a little knowledge of the subject, could help re-write some of the page it would be much appreciated. Jamesmarshall90 (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be deleted[edit]

Not affiliated with the game, developers, distributors, etc. in any way and consider the article to be acceptably informative. Ricktempest (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, come on, the game sucks worse than an old man trying to finish his Jolly Rancher while missing all his teeth. Ha. Leonnatus (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your disappointment with the game is no reason to propose a deletion of the page. The article's informative, and on a valid subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.160.197.68 (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]