Talk:Virtual instrument software architecture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dates[edit]

A date, even approximate, defining the implementation of VISA would be very helpful. When engineers consider re-employing existing equipment, a cut-off date for age would definitively eliminate specific devices as non-VISA. It's also good practice. The article has no dates.

History[edit]

Was VISA originally developed by NI? Sergivs-en (talk) 08:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Should this page not be renamed to "virtual instrument system architecture", as mentioned here? Fishezz (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do yourself a Google search; There are other sources defining it as virtual instrument software architecture. The IVI specs, curiously, don't appear to define the acronym. ~Kvng (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]