This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
I'm surprised that the neutrality of this article has been disputed. Although I admire Melody's work (which is why I wrote the article), I've kept my own opinions out of the piece. The main text is entirely factual statement. I have quoted positive reviews of her work, but only where they describe what the shows are actually about. It's necessary to quote theatre reviews in order to demonstrate notability - the only way to assess theatre in an encyclopedia article is to quote reviewers. I wanted to demonstrate Melody's notability clearly because a previous article on her was deleted for non-notability - but that was in 2008, before she'd made her breakthrough shows.Cephascrispus (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
