Talk:Verkehrsbetriebe Luzern

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Proposed merge of Nachtstern into Verkehrsbetriebe Luzern[edit]

No apparent independent notability – Muboshgu (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachtstern should have been allowed to be extended. The editor who requested its undeletion did not even participate in the discussion themselves. Ajf773 (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Take it up with the closing admin. There is no requirement that the undeletion requester participate in the deletion discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Simply redirected - there's zero cited information to merge. Feel free to add cited information to this article.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seems appropriate. Nachtstern had been nominated for deletion by me, so I'm comfortable with it. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]