Talk:Utica, New York/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Utica, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://startup.ny.gov/mohawk-valley/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2013/06/14/introducing-the-utica-comets-of-the-ahl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Historic places

It seems a bit unusual for there to be a massive list with whitespace within nothing but prose, of historic places that could either be in a separate category or article. Should I remove it? Buffaboy ^talk 01:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

These were added earlier today in the History Section and formatted as a,b,c,d,e... which I thought was horribly unreadable, so I changed it to the list format in a separate section. I was looking around and found the article on Albany which has a summary in a "Museums and historic sites" section and a whole separate article National Register of Historic Places listings in Albany, New York. That would probably be the best solution, but would be a lot of work to write a good article like this one for Utica. I guess it could just start out as a list. MB (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

I guess it's better than that big blurb that was under History, but we'll have to find a better solution at some point. Buffaboy ^talk 17:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)