Talk:University of La Verne/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Basic Standards
This is written as an ad, not as an encyclopedia entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.229.114 (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is a terrible poof piece
The history should be expanded and that value statement removed or dropped to the bottom. What is the source of information that these are really their values (as opposed to the values stated in their marketing literature). No where else on Wikipedia have I seen anything quite as non-encyclopedic as that values statement.69.224.95.26 (talk) 00:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://leopardathletics.com/insideAthletics/MissionStatement/Index. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 01:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Remove "additional citations needed?"
The note at the top of the main article was created in 2013 and states that more citations are needed. Many citations have been added since by myself and many others. Are there enough good citations to warrant that message being removed? If no, which sections could use improvement? I'd be glad to go through and find more citations if needed, but I am still new to editing on Wikipedia, so I am not sure what a good amount is. Thanks! Dylang140 (talk) 04:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)