Talk:United States Energy Association

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Review delays[edit]

Why can't you see the page in Google? Has it not been reviewed yet? Thanks! Doctorstrange617 (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doctorstrange617 new pages are not visible until they are reviewed (aka patrolled) by a member of the New Page Patrol (or another experienced editor), or are 90 days old, whichever comes first. There is a significant backlog for the review process, and it is best to assume that the 90 day deadline will apply. After that it depends on Google's schedule, which we cannot control, and cannot even determine with assurance. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First Look[edit]

likely a paid editor.

WP:SPIP

Multiple, identical citations; please use reference numbers and authors WP:DUPECITES

I suspect the copy was lifted from other USEA documents, Copyright problem.

Many, many self-referential citations all pointing to USEA's website.

Not written in encyclopedic style. Sorry, I haven't memorized all the tags Rhadow (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not Paid Editing[edit]

I'm not a paid editor at all...

Just not that experienced in Wikipedia, so I probably source more than I should.

I'm addressing your concerns now. Let me know if I can help in any way.

Doctorstrange617 (talk) 23:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doctorstrange617 -- Great, then we are on the same team. 00:08, 5 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhadow (talk • contribs) [reply]

References[edit]

This article has a preponderance of duplicated references. There are several methods to simplify the presentation of references. See, for example WP:REFNAME. Rhadow (talk) 12:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]