Talk:Uniplus+

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

April 2017[edit]

From the history of the article:

21:11, 20 April 2017‎ NapoliRoma (1,797 bytes) (+1,776)‎ . . (restore deleted article) (undo | thank)
10:25, 22 April 2017‎ Onel5969 (21 bytes) (-1,623)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 776403107 by NapoliRoma (talk): Restore redirect of stub with only primary references. (TW)) (undo | thank)
09:49, 21 April 2017‎ PRehse(1,628 bytes) (-169)‎ . . (undo | thank)
10:09, 21 April 2017‎ AnomieBOT (1,644 bytes) (+16)‎ . . (Dating maintenance tags: {{Primary}}) (undo)
10:25, 22 April 2017‎ Onel5969 (21 bytes) (-1,623)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 776403107 by NapoliRoma (talk): Restore redirect of stub with only primary references. (TW)) (undo | thank)
13:59, 22 April 2017‎ PBS (1,797 bytes) (+1,776)‎ . . (rv to last reversion by NapoliRoma.) (rollback: 1 edit | undo)

@user:Onel5969 it is a stub there is more than one reference. Did you do a search and look for other sources before you did the revert. For example Google Book search returns lots of other sources. Why not choose some of those and expand the article? -- PBS (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single independent reference. Why would you restore a virtually uncited stub without improving it, is a better question. Didn't say it should be deleted, simply that in its current form it is better as a redirect. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]