Talk:Ultrabook/Archives/2013

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Long Battery Life

There is actually something which I did not mention in my edit. "Long" battery life is actually an opinion and not a fact, because to some people 5-8 hours might be short; they could be looking for whole day battery life. 175.156.215.110 (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Also, these seem to be idle values, under full load even on ultrabooks the battery life can be less than ztwo hours. And you are right, that "5 hours is a long battery life" is an opinion, a whole day (24 hours) is more than any notebook can do, but some of them last for more than 12 hours idle. --MrBurns (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I agree, maybe we can add something like Actual performance may vary considerably based on usage. Zalunardo8 (talk) 10:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Removal of dubious comment regarding superiority of MacBook

There are two statements in this sentence in the History section I think should be removed:

It appeared that many OEMs were unable to offer an Ultrabook at a comparable spec and price to the MacBook Air,[22] and while some Ultrabooks were able to claim individual distinctions such as being the lightest or thinnest, the Air was still regarded by many reviewers as the best all-around Ultrabook.

Firstly, the first statement and reference are not related. The reference says the price of ultrabooks was too high for them to sell well, it does NOT mention a price/spec comparison to the MacBook Air. The price/spec of ultrabooks at the time may even have been better than the Macbook's (just not good enough).

Secondly, the second statement:"[...] regarded by many viewers as the best [...]" has no reference at all and seems a bit fanboy-ish to me.

Lastly, the source of statement 1 refers to research by iSuppli but does not give a title or date, nor does the link work. Further, the source author is a stockholder of AAPl. 217.122.183.107 (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Five sections called "Chief River"

The section repeats itself (without repeating the header) 5 times. N0w8st8s (talk) 11:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)n0w8st8s