Talk:Triazole

1,3,4 ?[edit]

Doesn't 1,3,4-Triazole (as if 1-position was that -NH- group) exist? --83.100.0.21 (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1,3,4-triazole is better named as 1,2,4-triazole, since it would be a tautomer. 66.166.38.18 (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IUPAC rules dictate that you use the lowest numbering for the locants thus 1,3,4 is wrong and 1,2,4 is correct.

Is this the same as 'triazoline'? Are they aromatic?

Simon de Danser (talk) 19:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]