Talk:Tremella fuciformis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alternate name?[edit]

Is an alternate name? Badagnani 21:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collagen content in the fungi....???[edit]

--124.78.208.251 (talk) 11:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--124.78.208.251 (talk) 11:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Useful infos in the following for referencing.....[edit]

although there are some defacts

--222.64.31.231 (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity on yeast state[edit]

I feel like the description of this species as a "parasitic yeast" is a bit confusing to the layman. My sense is that generally non-experts think of a "yeast" as a fungus that is unicellular throughout its entire life cycle, which these fungi are not - the phase of the life cycle a non-expert would most commonly encounter for this species is the multicellular fruiting body, which looks nothing like what most would imagine a "yeast" to be. The actual taxonomy gets very complicated what with the "true yeasts" versus those such as this species, which at some point have been dubbed "yeasts," but actually now reside in completely separate phyla.

Can anyone who knows more about mycology edit this to clarify that in this context, "yeast" refers specifically to the unicellular anamorphic stage of this fungus's life cycle and is not intending to describe where this species falls taxonomically? As a non-expert I am not sure that I could do this without making a bigger mess out of things. Mb620 (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tremella fuciformis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]