Talk:Traditional Grimsby smoked fish

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fisheries and Fishing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation Start‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted on 10 September 2010 by reviewer Mcmatter (talk · contribs).

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled[edit]

I have removed the following:

There has been no discussion of this contention nor any reason/evidence given to support its imposition. The democratic nature of Wikipedia denotes that debate entail before such accusations are upheld and such rewrite demands imposed. Robinjey1 (talk) 22.02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry but it does read like an advert so I am reinstating the tag. Perhaps someone less invested in the article should take a look at it and do some re-writes. --Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 23:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because this is an article about a commercial process, it is going to be difficult to remove too much of the market share and distinction that this product has. It may be beneficial to remove all company names and trade marks, this has worked with most editors in previous product articles.Francis E Williams (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems accurate and detailed to me. Snag is I know this from personal knowledge, on which some wikieditors frown. This is a PGI product, and much supporting information will have been submitted. Have a look at the two jounals linked on http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/registeredName.html?denominationId=1756 - in particular C49 28.02.2009 which contains excellent corroboration of what is written. I think the 'advert' assertion is contentious, argumentative, and unfounded. --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 23:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor who always comes down hard on commercial promo and spam I think the advert temp is harsh in this case. It is perhaps reasonable to remove or moderate the text about the GTFS Group, remove refs to its web site, and keep only that that can be supported by independent sources. The lede could be re-written as the tone, particularly the second part beginning "After processing the fish fillets", with words such as "distinctive", "subtle" and "comes into play", could be the offence that attracted the advert temp. This second part of the lede, re-written, perhaps belongs somewhere further down the article. As the PGI is the raison d'être for the article it should be mentioned in the very first sentence. Acabashi (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]