Talk:Torrey Canyon oil spill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Torrey Canyon[edit]

The ship is only notable for one event. The pages should be merged. QuentinUK (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Oil_tankers. BlackberrySorbet 10:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The event was hugely notable and remains significant for environmental legislation and marine ecology today. It may be fine to merge the ship and the ship's oil spill articles, but these should not be merged into some umbrella article on all ships or all wrecks or all tankers or whatever. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo needed[edit]

What I came here for was an image; was surprised to find none. A free one would be ideal but given the massive event a non-free image with NFUR would seem entirely appropriate. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Murphy's Law[edit]

The joke about Murphy's Law was just the funniest thing ever. I like reading encyclopedias because of all the funny jokes. --jiHymas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.149.103 (talk) 03:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HMG and Petroleum Jelly[edit]

"[...] as well as more RAF Hunters with liquefied petroleum jelly (not napalm, as HMG denied that the UK forces had stocks of napalm) to ignite the oil." Who or what on earth is HMG? How is the section in brackets even relevant? If liquefied petroleum jelly was used that's what was used.

This needs removing or rewriting. It reads like a conspiracist has decided to do randomly edit an article. I will return in a day or two and if not fixed I will remove "not napalm as HMG denied that the UK forces had stocks of napalm"

46.208.249.136 (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as per above. Napalm is not petroleum jelly. Who are HMG? The BBC article mentions napalm being used but this is not what the article said. Futures,yeah? (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HMG is "Her Majesty's Government". GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oil Spill[edit]

The section on the oil spill mentions the vessel lacking charts of the Canary Islands - should this not be charts of the Scilly Isles? The ship had left the Canaries some 4 days earlier - how would charts of the Canary Islands have helped them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.97.41.12 (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Torrey Canyon oil spill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note remark about l-scale charts[edit]

Most of us don't know what these are. Clarification is needed.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Torrey_Canyon_oil_spill&oldid=1206372711"