Talk:Tomb of Daniel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge from Daniel's Tomb[edit]

  • Merge Crested Penguin 01:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - John Carter 17:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  • Merge. Bukvoed 11:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for obvious reasons --Steven J. Anderson 19:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge these duplicates. IZAK 09:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, anyway. There are at least six shrines purported to be the "Tomb of Daniel" (Susa, Kirkuk, Samarkand, Tarsus, Alexandria, Baqubah), and it's probable that eventually one or two of these will have enough info for separate articles.--Pharos 10:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Although I agree Daniel's Tomb is the better name for the combined article, I believe the approach taken in Tomb of Daniel, which discusses the issue in general without focusing on any one site, should be preferred, so most of the content should come from that article. The present Daniel's Tomb article, which focuses on a single candidate site, should be shortened and summarized into a section of the main article. Best, --Shirahadasha 19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I believe enough time has elapsed and enough users have responded to satisfy WP:CONSENSUS, and suggest the merge simply be performed at this point. Best, --Shirahadasha 19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. I actually like the Tomb of Daniel title better (it's more formal), but whatever. I do strongly disagree that anything should be shortened — this information is all highly relevant.--Pharos 20:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged the pages. Chesdovi (talk) 09:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead/irrelevant references and links[edit]

I have removed one dead link, but I believe there are other links that are either dead or irrelevant please review and remove.