Talk:Tom Churchill
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled[edit]
Thnaks, it's now been "Wikified"!
All of these references are soureceable. A quick check through the Reader's Guid to Periodic Literature confirms all. What'sup with this robot troll?
i know this guy. he hasn't done anything interesting and should not have a wikipedia profile about him. he's online a lot and will probably remove this comment very quickly. just notice how many of the statements in his profile are from publicly verifiable sources - the answer is none. this is a vanity profile and nothing more and should not be showing up in wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.88.180.50 (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Careful of sourcing[edit]
I original added [1] as a primary source (not great but better then nothing) but when looking at [2] came across a similar think which says it's taken from wikipedia and looking at [3] shows a similar version. Looking at the history, I get the feeling this article was created by someone with a WP:COI anyway, notice how the name of the original contributor is the same as the name of the house Tom Churchill moved to? Nil Einne (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)