Talk:Tokelau/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

History

This was on the History of Tokelau page. As it makes no sense, I am moving the contents to here in the hope that someone can make something of it and am redirecting the history page to Tokelau. --Roisterer

Still not good enough for an entry on a separate page, but at least it now makes a bit more sense - Grutness|hello? 13:20, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

HISTORY OF TOKELAU Tokelau was originally settled by Polynesian emigrants from surrounding island groups. Originally it was comprised of three traibal chiefdoms, each rules by an Aliki (chief).The states were Atafu, Fakaofo and Nukunonu.

Atafu

Rulers

  • ?-? - Toniua
  • ?-? - Foli
  • ?-? - Tongia
  • ?-? - Fafie
  • ?-29 February 1916 - Tuilaka

Fakaofo

Rulers

  • ?-? - Letaiolo
  • ?-? - Poufau
  • fl. 1841 - Taupe
  • fl.1846-fl.1852 - Havaiki I
  • fl.1858 - Lika
  • fl.1871 - Longotahi
  • ?-May 1881 - Vaopuka
  • fl.1881-ca.1890 - Te Taulu
  • fl.1892-1902 - Tavita Te Fuli
  • 1902-29th February 1916 - Ielemia Havaiki II

Nukunonu

Rulers

  • ? - ? Sunga
  • ? - ? Kakaia
  • ? - ? Ngala
  • ? - ? Ulua
  • ? - ? Falevai

? - 29th February 1916 Takua

dollar figures

Are the dollar figures in the economy section New Zealand dollars or U.S. dollars? The Euro values have been added subsequently by an anonymous user. It's possible that the original numbers came from a U.S. source (like the factbook) or from a N.Z. government source. Ben Arnold 23:28, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Flag of Tokelau

according to the CIA World Factbook, it shares the flag of New Zealand. However I have seen many references to its own flag. eg [1] Maybe its just supposed to be decorative, not "official."

There is a very interesting article in the May 1st 2006 "New Yorker" which documents a referendum for Tokelau's independence as well as the land's history.

Proposed WikiProject

In my ongoing efforts to try to include every country on the planet included in the scope of a WikiProject, I have proposed a new project on Polynesia at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Polynesia whose scope would include Tokelau. Any interested parties are more than welcome to add their names there, so we can see if there is enough interest to start such a project. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Traditional Capital?

Tokelau has no official capital. But according to the Fakaofo webpage, Fakaofo is the "chiefly atoll" of Tokelau. The history page asserts that Tokelau became a unified entity when Fakaofo conquered the other two atolls. So could Fakaofo perhaps be listed as a "traditional capital"? Inkan1969 18:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Having just visited Tokelau, it appears to be three relatively autonomous atolls each wishing to assert their dominance and role. This would account for none of them being chosen as the "capital". At present they operate as separate states in a confederacy and are likely to continue to do this after they vote for independence. At present the capital it probably technically Wellington in NZ. There are administrative offices on Atafu where the head of government currently lives. There is also an administrative office in Apia although now, with the internet and good telephone links to the world, these functions are gradually being moved back to Tokelau. Rather than someone in Wikipedia deciding on a capital, it might be best to leave that to the country to decide once it has self-determination. There remains the possibility that it might never declare itself to have a capital and have the meetings of the fono rotate between the atolls. Now wouldn't that be interesting.
--CloudSurfer 18:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Your post seems to assume they would vote for independence, but that did not happen. They have chosen to remain part of New Zealand. Johntex\talk 03:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


The article says that the capital rotates every year, and links to the Tokelau government website, but there is no mention of this on that page. Can we get a better source or simply remove this? The best source I can find says that each island has its own administrative center and that there is no administrative center for the whole of Tokelau. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trceniviva (talk • contribs) 14:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

I found a source that confirms this user's comment. The World Fact Book says, "the meeting place of the Tokelau Council rotates annually among the three atolls; this tradition has given rise to the somewhat misleading description that the capital rotates yearly between the three atolls; in actuality, it is the seat of the government councilors that rotates since Tokelau has no capital". Axel41 (talk) 18:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Recent visit and projected future visits

Having just returned from a trip to Tokelau, I have uploaded a number of photographs and made some edits to the various entries. I have some other photographs I could upload and will probably return to Tokelau next year and could take any specific pictures that might be helpful. I am based in Apia, Samoa where the Tokelau Apia Liaison Office (TALO) is situated and could access further information from them if thought valuable.

If someone or some group is caring for this page, please let me know if I can be of any assistance. --CloudSurfer 19:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Brilliant. Keep up the good work. Pics from Tokelau were sorely needed. Thanks! --Targeman 19:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Tokelauan Scouting

Can someone render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Tokelauan? Thanks! Chris 06:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Flag of Tokelau

I would prefer that this page show the unofficial flag of Tokelau, on the grounds that its the only flag in use which actually represents Tokelau specifically, official or not. But if a flag absolutely has to be official to be displayed, we shouldn't show anything at all — the New Zealand flag, while covering Tokelau, is not "the flag of Tokelau", as displaying on this page would imply. ("Flag of X" and "Flag of the country that X is part of" are not interchangeable, or else there's no such thing as a subnational flag). -- Vardion 05:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I restored the official flag (the flag of New Zealand). Wikipedia article are consistent in displaying the official flag. If we deviate from that, we would open the door to all sorts of independence movement flags, rebel flags, suggested flags, etc. Johntex\talk 03:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
But the New Zealand flag is not the official flag of Tokelau. It's the official flag of the country that Tokelau is part of, and these two very different things should not be confused. -- Vardion —Preceding comment was added at 04:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the position of Vardion. However, the unofficial flag is now represented twice and NZ's flag not at all... Alice.S 03:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Topography

Does anyone know the topography of the islands in terms of their mean elevation above sea level and/or their highest elevation? I am wondering how much danger this territory faces from hypothetical rising sea levels. Johntex\talk 03:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

consists of three atolls (Atafu, Fakaofo, Nukunonu), each with a lagoon surrounded by a number of reef-bound islets of varying length and rising to over 3 m above sea level CIA, On google earth some parts seem to get up to 10 or so meters, most is at 0-4m. So I'm thinking they would be very vunerable to rise in sea level. Looks like a funny place, so small and yet so few built up areas, unlike other small island countries that seem to have destroyed large portions of the forest areas. I think it wouldn't be too hard to move them even if the sea level did rise though :p, only like 1500 of them, they would fit on one boat. Jackaranga 15:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Nov. 4 reversion

I am reverting the last few edits for the following reasons...

  • Introduction: addition of a run-on sentence and several instances of passive voice ("was," "were," etc.)
  • Improper use of parentheses throughout the article
  • Unnecessary redirects
  • Ungrammatical sentence and what appears to be, I could be mistaken here, removal of a sizable chunk of content in the "Government formation" section
  • Most of the law section is not notable enough to merit inclusion at all. What is notable should be moved to another section
  • POV changes to the "Internet" section
  • Improper grammar and spacing near the end of the article
  • Addition of several incorrect categories - Tokelau is not a country, it is part of NZ. It therefore also does not belong in Category:NZ-Pacific relations.
  • I figure it's more... diplomatic of me to explain my reversion before proceeding. Perspicacite 06:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Well done for bringing it up here Perspicacite. Rather than reverting, can you please obtain consensus for your proposals here first? --John 06:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to obtain consensus for change before changes are made. I have taken the liberty of reproducing your bulleted points below (but with numbers so that we can more easily discuss them):

  1. Introduction: addition of a run-on sentence and several instances of passive voice ("was," "were," etc.)
  2. Improper use of parentheses throughout the article
  3. Unnecessary redirects
  4. Ungrammatical sentence and what appears to be, I could be mistaken here, removal of a sizable chunk of content in the "Government formation" section
  5. Most of the law section is not notable enough to merit inclusion at all. What is notable should be moved to another section
  6. POV changes to the "Internet" section
  7. Improper grammar and spacing near the end of the article
  8. Addition of several incorrect categories - Tokelau is not a country, it is part of NZ. It therefore also does not belong in Category:NZ-Pacific relations.

With regard to 1, 2 and 3, please could you give specific examples of the existing text and that to which you wish to change it?

4: Please specify the offending "Ungrammatical sentence" and then exactly what you wish to change it to. What exactly do you think has been lost? Are you aware that the post 1948 part was moved to the new section "Government"?

5. Why do you think it not notable that villagers make their own laws - especially in the context of the UN view that Tokelau is still a "colony". What section should the "law" sub-section be moved to?

6. What are the "POV" changes to the Internet section? Do you mean "external links"?

7. As regards these, if they are trivial, please just make the changes as that's probably better than discussing them - if they're bone-headed I'm sure someone will quickly correct them - that's the way Wikipedia works.

8. I'd have to disagree that the category "NZ-Pacific relations" is inappropriate any more than the inclusion of the Cook Islands in this category would be inappropriate since neither are de facto integral parts of NZ (even if they both are de jure NZ territory). I feel that categories are useful to people wishing to study a particular area of interest and this categorisation is appropriate to anyone wishing to study the relationship - historical and contemporary - between "colonizer" and "colonized" Pacific peoples such as Samoa, the Cooks, etc.

Finally can I point out that reversion is usually just used for vandals (or perhaps where complicated syntax changes have been made to tables, etc, that are difficult to individually edit).

Rather than revert why not edit the existing article - that way you are less likely to lose valuable meterial from other editors such as conversion templates, etc (in your self-reverted 4th revert, for example, you lost referenced and cited material and the (1916) date of attachment to the Gilbert and Ellice Islands)... Alice.S 07:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

1, 2, 3, and 4 are all in the reference you added to the beginning. I saw prior to the partial reversion that the 1948 part was moved to "government" so I kept that change. For 5 I dont think Tokelau's nine soldiers are notable enough to be mentioned. I would move most of the "law" section to "government." I consider the last changes to the "internet" section to be POV. I dealt with 7 in the partial reversion. I dont feel strongly about eight. The NZ-Pacific relations category is fine. Your comment about reversion being used by vandals is completely untrue and would indicate inexperience with Wikipedia. Perspicacite 07:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Great!

So, unless anyone else disagrees, we have a consensus to retain 8, the categorisation.

(You are absolutely right about my inexperience - if you check my contributions history you will see that I have not yet made thousands of edits. However I did not write that reversion is used by vandals. I meant that it was a good tool to counter vandalism.)

Do I understand that your objections 1, 2, 3 and 4 are objections to the QUOTE in the citation!?! I really don't have the experience to deal with that. Do you think quotations should be included in the "citeweb" template, John?

5: Are you actually reading the same article as me, Perspicacite: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tokelau&oldid=169088980 ?

Nowhere in the version of our article that I completed does the text contain a mention whatever of "Tokelau's nine soldiers" or even any soldiers whatever! (The closest reference I can find is, again in a QUOTE in a citation and that refers to nine POLICEMEN!)

May I beg you again to actually type out here the "the last changes to the "internet" section" that you "consider" " to be POV." so that we can all see exactly what it is you think warrants reverting rather than correcting? Alice.S 08:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

My objections are not to the quote, but to the parenthetical comments and subsequent commentary. The quote is way too long anyways. Soldiers... police officers... whatever. There are not enough of them to merit inclusion. See what I just changed to the Internet section. The previous changes I would consider POV. Perhaps members of the NZ-WikiProject could weigh in on this. Perspicacite 08:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I am very disappointed that you have just reverted AGAIN and excised sourced material without concluding a consensus here (or even answering the questions put to you).

Are you really so pressed for time/contemptuous of your fellow editors powers of judgement and understanding that you can not wait a few hours to discuss your proposed changes fIRST?

Where is this "internet" section? Can you not type it out below so we can see what the heck you're on about?Alice.S 09:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry I disappointed you :(. Perhaps members of the NZ-WikiProject could weigh in on this. Perspicacite 09:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I cannot confirm that the drive on the left in Tokelau. I spoke to one Tokelauan who said that on his atoll (I forget which) they had one tractor and one motorbike and about 20 metres of track. He had never seen the two vehicles passing to say that there was an established rule. As for soldiers, Tokelau has no military, only police. Defence is a responsibility of NZ. Noel Ellis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Ellis (talk • contribs) 07:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Categorization

Changed this to Tokelau-importance=mid until the issue with the overall NZ importance is fixed. Wallie (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Sport

Only rugby league is listed under sport. Surely as a dependency of New Zealand, rugby union would be more common?--MacRusgail (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Anthem

The CIA factbook states that Tokelau has an anthem called "Te Atua" chosen in 2008, although God Save the Queen is still official. Does anyone know anything else about this song? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I wonder if there is some confusion with the national symbol of Tokelau which has a similar motto, and was also chosen in 2008.-gadfium 02:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Timezone

Hello everyone, I've just read that "Tokelau will skip to UTC+13:00 after December 29, 2011", (see: List of time zones by UTC offset: UTC-10:00, source: BBC World News). Is this information reliable? Should I then update Tokelau's page, UTC-10:00, UTC+13:00? --Simo94 (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

It is reliable, however it only applies in 2012. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 23:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

So, now that the time zone has shifted, it shifted to what? In the CIA World Factbook Graphic Tokelau's time zone is UTC+14, but other sources say it is UTC+13. Which one is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.93.167.186 (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Elekhh (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

There is a page for Netball in Tokelau. The information there can easily be put into the sports section here. It is not notable enough to stand alone. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Support May as well until a Sport in Tokelau article is made. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Yup, makes sense. The page is only a stub anyway. Coyote-37 (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Support A paragraph-long page doesn't make any sense. --Simo94 / discuss 17:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

.tk domains

  • The article says that free domains are HTTP only, but that's wrong. I registered for one of the free domains today, and HTTP, HTTPS, SSH, Telnet, and FTP all work fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.177.236.69 (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


  • You're right. Both this article and .TK are outdated. Going to fix problems asap. --Simo94 / discuss 21:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.dot.tk
    Triggered by \bdot\.tk\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

no vehicles?

There are no vehicles on any island of Tokelau. --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tokelau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tokelau/Archive_1&oldid=1169302713"