Talk:Tocobaga

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tampa Bay (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles

Tocobago and the de Soto expedition[edit]

I removed the statement that the Tocobago had contact with Hernando de Soto. "The de Soto expedition ... failed to encounter the Tocobago Indians, ...". [Jerald T. Milanich. (1995.) Florida Indians and the Invasion from Europe. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press. P. 73.] Moreover, the chroniclers of both the Narvaez and the de Soto expeditions did not mention Tocobago by name. The name "Tocobago" does not appear in Spanish documents until the visit by Menéndez de Avilés in 1567.[John H. Hann. (2003.) Indians of Central and South Florida 1513-1763. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press. P. 105.] -- Donald Albury 00:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tocobaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060101035431/http://pelotes.jea.com/Tocob.htm to http://pelotes.jea.com/Tocob.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about deletion of "nation" infobox[edit]

The study of ancient and historic indigenous peoples has been increasingly well-developed, and there are academic classifications and conventions about documentation through archeology and written records. For instance, peoples who are identified through archeology are generally referred to as participating in an archeological culture. There may be chiefdoms and groups of bands, such as the Uzita, but they do not comprise a nation state or country in any contemporary meaning of the word. It is Original Research, prohibited on Wikipedia, to make up a new way to classify them, as was done on a previous infobox. This approach is not supported by Reliable Sources, which we as editors are required to use. Editors need to read enough to understand the context for materials on the indigenous peoples.Parkwells (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes in general are a helpful tool for gathering key info into an easy to read format. While the nation infobox probably wasn't appropriate for use on this article, I actually thought it added some value. Is there not an indigenous peoples infobox? If not, I think that somebody should go ahead and create one. Zeng8r (talk) 20:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, Parkwells, that infobox is not appropriate. Some similar articles use the ethnic group infobox.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as Cuchullain notes, there is an ethnic group infobox, which has been used for numerous Native American tribes, including contemporary state-recognized Native American tribes in Virginia (I added the infoboxes to those several articles about these tribes.) I would recommend this infobox be used for these Florida chiefdoms and other Native American tribes. Parkwells (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]