Talk:Title 15 of the United States Code

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article meets criterion A3 for speedy deletion.[edit]

Iridescent wrote that it was "silly" to nominate this page for speedy deletion. Although user:Iridescent is, of course, entitled to the opinion, that editor provided no basis for that opinion. The criteria for speedy deletion includes item A3: "No content. Any article (other than disambiguation pages and redirects, including soft redirects) consisting only of external links." This page does indeed consist only of external links. The article includes no expansion of the topic, no discussion (from RS's or otherwise) on the topic, nor any other information other than the external links that include the text of the regulations. Although Iridescent can have an opinion, it is at variance with the WP policy.
— James Cantor (talk) (formerly, MarionTheLibrarian) 17:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for reference, this position was taken to Afd, as as stated in the link above, was opposed by a consensus of 11 to 1 and closed accordingly. DGG (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]