This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
Common infobox: as long as there are 2 candidates, most parameters make no sense. The problem with 2 infoboxes is that they are far larger than the current text of either of the 2 locations, so they "hang" far below the respective sections (ugly layout). Can they be place NEXT to each other? For now best solution: both at the top. If the sections for both candidates will be expanded, the infoboxes can be moved there, but even then, first consider that having them together helps comparing the 2 locations on the map. Placing them NEXT to each other at the top can also be a solution, but how?
"State of Palestine" map far too big, can only have political (I/P) reasons, which make no sense in an article about a Hebrew Bible town (mainly Iron Age, if not fictional). Arminden (talk) 10:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
