This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
I propose that Khirbet et-Tibbaneh be merged into Timnah. The two article are explaining the same subject, and Timnah article is older. Sokuya (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Without question, it is a very bad idea to merge these two articles, since they refer to two different sites, with two different coordinates. The only thing similar to them is that they bear the same name --- similar as it were to Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and Bethlehem, Israel. Just as it would not be right to merge these two articles, so is it not right to merge the two articles named "Timnah." Both places have their respective histories.Davidbena (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
