Talk:Three shekel ostracon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I can not find any of the claims made in this article online. In fact I found that the examination of Patina, reviled that the ostracon was authentic. http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=29&Issue=3&ArticleID=9 The second claim is from blog and unasbale.


I found authentic claim from WP:RS, confirming previous edits, so it is ok.--Tritomex (talk) 09:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]