This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
In the titles the film's title appears to be 3, not Three. I didn't see "three" spelled out anywhere; it's just the digit "3". If no one objects, I'll rename the article to "3 (2010 film)", if I can figure out how to deal with the possible necessity of also renaming 3 (film) to 3 (1971 film). If someone with more familiarity with renaming articles likes the idea, go for it; I won't have time to figure it out for a while. — Steve98052 (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to move it based on your rationale, the film poster, etc, then I saw this from the director's website, which seems to indicate it's spelt out as Three over just the number. I'll post a note on the talkpage of the film project to see if anyone has any hard evidence either way. Lugnuts (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the opening titles you have to keep in mind that the title here should be the one most recognizable to English readers. However both ways seem to be about equally official also in Germany. The German theatrical poster says Drei, but the teaser poster (the one used in this article) says 3. Most official sources seem to say Three or Drei. Screen and THP call it Three in their reviews while Variety call it 3. In cases like this it's usually best to just let the article stay where it is. Smetanahue (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Given that, inertia seems like the best choice, even if the digit is the only written title that appears on screen in the film (which I just saw on Monday at a Seattle International Film Festival press screening) in titles or credits. Incidentally, it's listed as Three on IMDB, but lists 3 as "(original title)". I added the digit title on the 3 (disambiguation) page, which should cover it if anyone looks for it by the digit title. — Steve98052 (talk) 07:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And I've just redirected 3 (2010 film) to here. Well the article, not the talk page... Lugnuts (talk) 07:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
