This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
article name "The Wilson" vs. "Wilson (Indianapolis, Indiana)"[edit]
What name to use for articles on numerous Indianapolis apartment buildings has been discussed at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Marion County, Indiana#Odd one word names. Short version: the NRIS database version should be corrected from "Wilson" to "The Wilson", etc. I will work at doing that. Any further comments about the general issue should be made at that discussion.
Here in this article on The Wilson, the article was started by User:Nedtorson at "The Wilson" and was subsequently moved by User:Nyttend to "Wilson (Indianapolis, Indiana)". Nyttend also recalled the previous discussion and notified me of the move. I just now moved it back to "The Wilson" and believe it should stay there. This is consistent with the discussion to date. The confusion here is my fault because I led the discussion but did not implement the changes. Sorry for the confusion. Hope this is all straightened out now for this one. I will work at updating all the others, too. doncram (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record — I remembered that a discussion had taken place, but I didn't remember where it was or what had been decided. Nyttend (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
