Talk:The Way of Shadows

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 19 January 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Comment[edit]

Hello there, I am the one who recently updated the ending of "The Way of the Shadows." I just want to say that there needs to be more information on the first and don't even get me started about the other two. All you have on them is what is on the back of the books. They are a great trilogy from an uprising author, and yet you have nothing on the subject. With what I added to the first book helped finish it off. thanks to you guys there are tons of sights out there that perpetrate the ending so abruptly at a random point in the story. It makes the story look like something I wouldn't want to read. Jeez. get on it or I'll do it all. take you choice.

Might've helped if you'd signed your name.Gymnophoria (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GOCEreviewed[edit]

This article is too unbalanced to be worth copy editing. It needs major updates bearing in mind Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (item 1) and all of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. --Stfg (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overlong[edit]

Wow, someone's basically rewritten the whole novel on this page. Totally unnecessary and unwarranted for a page of such minimal interest!Gymnophoria (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]