Talk:The San Jose Group
 | This article was nominated for deletion on February 22 2012. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Storage[edit]
I am moving this to the Talk page:
The company was among the first Hispanic agencies operating on the national level and used universal Spanish—verses other Spanish dialects—to insure clear communication with the Hispanic market.[1]
- ^ "San Jose Knows Way to Hispanic Market". Adweek. 1981.
Generally "firsts" are promotional, as is "to ensure clear communications" but I cannot say for sure without seeing the article if there isn't something notable there worth including. Corporate Minion 18:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
The floor wax campaign is interesting and covered in substantial depth by an independent journalist. We evaluate whether something is worth considering based on whether reliable sources have found it important to cover. This would be a good one to add a couple sentences on. I am pruning the others that are not notable. Corporate Minion 19:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Length & advice[edit]
The sections don't seem too long to be honest. However I don't think the section titles are right. I would be inclined to merge the "Notable" sections together into a History of the group - and introduce other relevant material in the timeline. --Errant (chat!) 14:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't think it was that long overall from a general sense, but the article is now 85% case studies and awards. But neither am I entrenched about it. If you think it's ok, I'll just leave it alone. Corporate 20:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I merged the two campaign sections. It was way too long and smacked of advertising. Converting it to bullet-list is much better. The Dissident Aggressor 22:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)