Talk:The MF Life

Fancruft edits

I partially reverted the edits of Robynloud to this artice. Although I kept/revised some of the added content, that is useful, most of it was poorly written, in some places direct copy-and-paste/copy-vio that's clearly unacceptable, and in some places unsourced or sourced with an unreliable source like the user-generated content cited from a user review at http://musicmp3.ru. Much of his revision read like a press release (even if you're citing a press release, things like this are not encyclopedic: "Amazon spoke on how Fiona had crossed many bridges to arrive at The MF Life. Conceptual bridges. Spiritual bridges. Actual bridges. Stadium-thumpin' bridges. Hard-lovin' emotional bridges.") and terms that are to be avoided (WP:MOS/Words to watch) like peacock and weasel terms. Also, unnecessary subheader changes, MOS issues, an unsourced release history section, and undue weight given to a Melanie Fiona quote that adds little encyclopedic value to the album's background. Comments? Dan56 (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

I followed the steps at the bottom of Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus", but the editor reverted me without an explanation. Welcome to comment here. Dan56 (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Feedback It's clear that many of these reversions by Dan56 are in keeping with policy and guidelines on Wikipedia. I'm neutral on this quotation, but it's clear that (e.g.) non-professional reviews don't belong. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)