This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
sounds like a review Rds865 (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
This is actually a very significant book, but the wiki article clearly needs a lot of clean up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.105.220 (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Review section is POV and OR. I'm reoving it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.113.3 (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What sources, other than reviews, can you use in an article about a book? Your personal opinion, maybe?