Talk:The Lastest Gun in the West/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

See below comments. Ruby2010 talk 18:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will review sometime today. Ruby2010 talk 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You need something on the episode's ratings in the lead
- Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Provide links to the characters' articles in the plot section
- Done. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Despite making progress Buck is not restored to hero-status, but Homer has an idea. Keep in mind I have not seen this particular episode, but this sentence is slightly confusing. Perhaps make it more clear that you are referring to Bart and Buck's "hero-status" (like..."not restored to hero-status for Bart")?
- Sounds good. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In a rare moment (for The Simpsons) Italicize The Simpsons. This sounds sort of like original research, and may need a citation.
- Removed In a rare moment (for The Simpsons). Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I assume the first half of the cultural refs section is cited from the DVD commentary (i.e. The episode title, which is often wrongfully referred to as "The Latest Gun In the West"...)?
- Yes. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How many total viewers watched the episode (i.e. how many million)?
- I don't know, I could not find any information about it and the only ratings source I have doesn't mention it. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at my comments, edit accordingly, and respond back on this page. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 18:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'll place the review on hold for seven days while you sort out the suggestions. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 18:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good to go. Pass for GA. Nice work! Ruby2010 talk 21:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]