This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Please explain why there should be a list of the sections of the newspaper in this article. I feel that it is advertising and has no place here. Joe407 (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it deserves to be there. Its rival, Jewish Week, has its sections listed on its wikipedia article. So Jewish Press should have it, too. Mazeartist (talk) 10:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I will go and take a look at that page. Perhaps the sections should not be listed there either. Take a look at Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. On the other hand, it may just need a different presentation. Joe407 (talk) 17:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
