Talk:The Blind Bandit

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
	This redirect is supported by the American animation work group.

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the Nickelodeon task force.

Screenshots[edit]

Though I love decorating articles with images, is it more proper to adhere to the "one per article" rule on TV screenshots? That is a rule, right? Since it's in parentheses on that pull-down menu on the Upload page. (The exception would be those "list of episodes" articles, but that's entirely another matter.) --Crisu 17:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must have missed that. I have seen various other episode pages that use more than one image (such as Avatar's very own The Swamp (Avatar: The Last Airbender episode)) so I didn't think it was a problem. I know they're not episode pages but pages such as Fire Nation and Water Tribe use multiple images. --Redsparta 17:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That (one per page) thing is a little vauge. I think the meaning of it is to not make it so it's worthless to watch the episodes or something. I'm sure there are loop holes. H2P 18:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-wrestling references[edit]

May I ask why the two bullet points I added this morning were removed? Niwanda Jones 02:22 24 April 2007 (UTC)

proboubly because they were viewed as Original Research We've been making sure not to include those in the articles. I don't add any, but some people add info the qualifies as Original Research. The Placebo Effect 02:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would using language to the effect of "appears similar to" help offset this? Because a number of notes regarding the episodes seem to fall into that category. Thanks! Niwanda Jones 02:31 24 April 2007 (UTC)

If you think they don't belong remove them withthe edit summary "Remove per WP:OR" The Placebo Effect 02:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]