Talk:Tensilica

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Early comments[edit]

This looks like an advert - not up to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality

I came across this article just now (Dec 18, 2010), and while some sentences do sound like they've been lifted from Tensilica's product sell-sheets and promotional material, the overall article is not so tainted that it warrants a rewrite (or removal.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.60.55.64 (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the jargon factor is worse than promotional tone. At least the lead should be in English, with acronyms spelled out on first use in the body, where the details could go. W Nowicki (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised that the link to Cadence pointed to the company's homepage rather than to their Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.240.193.13 (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps was fixed? In the text the links should be WikiLinks, while the infobox can have web links. W Nowicki (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored some content[edit]

More work needs to be done, but article needs mention of Xtensa IP CPU (a CPU provided as Intellectual Property to companies that want to make chips partly based on it) beyond the diagram, and most especially the very popular ESP chips that use it. Much more work needs to be done, I removed all the peacocking I saw, will keep the "reads like an advertisement" warning until I can do more in the coming weeks/months. Hga (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, the article is now good enough that the "contains content that is written like an advertisement" template could be removed. Does anybody disagree? If so, what exactly needs to be changed? Insulation2 (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]