Talk:Tayasal (archaeological site)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eixequil[edit]

The article mentions the city of Eixequil (the Yalnain capital). I would appreciate if anyone could give me any reliable source on this city, since I can find none. Thanks in advance. --Monfornot (talk) 18:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect Eixequil is probably an irregular or mistaken spelling for Quexil (in modern Spanish; colonial spelling Quechil; originally in Maya Ek'Ixil ), a Maya town on the lago of the same name, in the eastern 'province' of the core Itza territory at the time of the conquest. The town was done over along with others when Martin de Ursua came thru. Not sure however about this being the 'capital' of the Yalnain (should be spelled Yalain) region, since the actual township/centre of Yalain lies further to the east of Lago Peten Itza. Would have to look into it some more. For a good ref, see The Conquest of the Last Maya Kingdom by Grant Jones (1998). --cjllw ʘ TALK 10:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Knew there was something wrong about this site. Thank you for the tip, will try to find the book. --Monfornot (talk) 18:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too much reliance on Arlen Chase[edit]

There is far too much reliance on Arlen Chase's interesting but largely discredited theory that the Itza capital was at Topoxte. Jones, Rice & Rice pretty much put this theory to rest many years ago and most modern scholars consider Lake Petén Itzá to be the site of the Itza capital based on the Spanish descriptions and colonial documentation, of which there is apparently a great deal. Simon Burchell (talk) 08:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this - not only is it effectively discredited, it refers to the Maya capital at Nojpetén, not the archaeological site on the San Miguel peninsula, across the lake (which is the subject of this article). Simon Burchell (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tayasal (archaeological site). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.caracol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ac79.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.caracol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/English83.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808042226/http://www.asociaciontikal.com/pdf/053_Pugh_et_al__2011.pdf to http://www.asociaciontikal.com/pdf/053_Pugh_et_al__2011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]