Talk:Take-grant protection model

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The first paragraph describes the Take-Grant model as the model for examining protection systems, however the Lipton/Snyders article clearly describes it as a protection system and the article is in fact an examination of the viability of Take-Grant as a protection system.

I will try to come back later and update this, if I get the chance. If someone else wants to take it on, please feel free, or post your opinion here. Cthomp17 (talk) 02:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Chris T.[reply]

The given link to the article of Lipton and Snyder is broken. 85.178.192.90 (talk) 11:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]