Talk:Taizan Maezumi

Taizan Maezumi was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Buddhism High‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Biography / Religion B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:30, April 27, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Biography task force.

This article is supported by the Religion task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Citations[edit]

This article has a lot of good information, but needs citations and a reference section.Nightngle 15:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Misc.[edit]

Hey, this page was added by Zen Mountain Monastery (http://www.mro.org/zmm) from our own website. So there is no copyright problem. Thanks

Please read the rules regarding copyrights - unless you can submit the information as one of the open copyrights that anyone can use in anyway they wish, then you really can't use the information. The page is actually a wikipedia page and doesn't "belong" to any one member, even if that article is about the person or group. Let me know if you have further questions.Nightngle 15:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article could indeed do with some expansion. --DanielCD 16:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA failure[edit]

Prose - the introduction is too detailed, and talks about things that are best left to later in the article.

Citations - The citation format is completely wrong - references should follow one of the accepted citation formats, not a bunch of authors and pages, then followed by a list of references in a separate section, and then a bibliography.

MOS - This is a Japanese subject, and not only is the article titling wrong per the Japanese MOS, there are no kanji given for names and no italicization of Japanese terms.

Organization is poor - There are pictures of people who have nothing substantial to do with a section in the section. There is extensive material about other people in the bio section - is the article about the person or his school? They are separate.

In short, still a lot of work to do. Try for a lower class first.MSJapan (talk) 04:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning citations, see WP:CITE#Shortened_notes. If you are familiar with kanji, why not add the kanji names? By the way, how are pictures of his father and teacher not related to the subject? Both men gave him dharma transmission. Some of your criticism is duly noted, and some is not. Thanks anyway. (Mind meal (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Mention of specific person[edit]

I changed diff my own edit on Maezumi's affairs. The interview with his daughter discloses tragedy, and yet also love and wisdom. Personally, I was touched by it, and it kept me thinking over the night. There's already been so much tragedy, I think (feel); no need to further impair people, by specifically naming them. Readers who are interested can follow the link to the interview, or read the account Dale S. Wright wrote, which is clear, but also factual and balanced. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 04:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]