Talk:Susta Rural Municipality

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/india-encroaches-nepal-s-territory-destroys-264-pillars
Triggered by \bnowpublic\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Municipality vs village[edit]

Should the article be split into two to make the distinction between "Susta rural municipality" and the (disputed) "Susta village" territory clearer? Or, is there a way to clarify it in this article itself? Abecedare (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: Is it that the Nepalese government uses the term "Susta rural municipality" to refer to the same disputed territory? Moreover, the currently cited sources apparently don't give the exact detail of who currently controls the disputed territory. A source apparently says that there is presence of the forces of both the countries in the disputed territory. —Jakichandan (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I even don't know who holds the control of the disputed area. I just removed who controls it from article. If you think there should be a separate article like Kalapani territory then Ok. I am agree with you. 👤Raju💌 01:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]