Talk:Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2

Untitled

The presence of Scott Baio sinks this even lower than I'd previously imagined.

Yes, This movie should be sent into the pits of hell --Wallaby 10:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I was forced to watch this movie with my little brother. All I can say is: "Worst. Movie. Ever."--Jon Revelle 02:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I saw the movie, it was not exactly good, but I wonder why it bombed. KinseyLOL 00:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I am not allowed to back seat mod, but people, this isn't a forum for your opinions, if you want to talk about why this is 'crap' then go find forums to talk about this on. 207.14.79.71 03:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Baby Geniuses 3

Are the rumors true? I hope not.. KinseyLOL 17:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, they are: http://www.crystal-sky.com/renegadefilms.htm

WE MUST KILL IT! WITH FIRE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.58.119 (talk) 15:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Twins

I find it very interesting that many, if not most, of the babies in the movie are actually twins. Is there any one out there who can elaborate more on this for the main article? --Caue (T | C) 21:08, Wednesday 2010-04-7 (UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 21:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC).

"Reviews were universally negative."

Yes, it is plainly obvious that the movie sucked. Sequels to bad ideas are seldom a good thing. "Universally" is a strong word. In this case, it would mean that everyone disliked everything about the movie. This is impossible to demonstrate and unsourced. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2004/2004st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)