Talk:Super Mario 64/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jibreel23 (talk · contribs) 13:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Criteria

Well written

This article fits the criteria for well written as it has no grammatical errors, and is concise. It also complies with the Manual of Style.

Verifiable

Does not have plagiarism, original research, controversial quotes or citations.

Broad in Coverage

The article covers all the main aspects, and stays on topics. Although I thought mentioning fan projects is unnecessary, Super Mario Bros. which is a good article, talks about fangames, and even has full articles devoted to them. See Tuper Tario Tros.

Neutral

The article is not biased towards any viewpoints.

Stable

The article does not get many edits a day. It can go a couple days without edits although compared to other good articles it gets more edits.

Illustrated

The article has a good amount of pictures with good captions. It also has valid fair use rationales for all the images used.

I would pass the article as it fits all the criteria.

• @Coolperson177: @Jibreel23: This was a really...really poor review, and I've gone ahead and reversed the promotion for the following reasons. First of all, Super Mario 64 was demoted from Featured Article status in April this year. This review does not explain how the article has been improved to address the concerns raised there. I understand this isn't an FA nomination, but the concerns are still valid for GA. Second of all, the reviewer did not ask any changes of the nominator, or offer any criticism to improve the article. Third of all, the reviewer only has 110 lifetime edits. In the interest of maintaining the integrity of the GA status, and giving the nominator (who worked hard on this article) a better quality review, I've undone the promotion. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 17:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

OK, I respect that. Thank you. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 17:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

@TarkusAB: Alright thanks for the feedback — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jibreel23 (talk • contribs) at 21:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)